About W. Mark Lanier
Born 1960. W. Mark Lanier is an American lawyer.
William Mark Lanier (born October 20, 1960 ) is an American trial lawyer, founder of the Lanier Law Firm, philanthropist and Christian author and speaker. He has led a number of high-profile product litigation suits resulting in billions of dollars in damages, including Johnson & Johnson baby powder and Merck & Co.'s Vioxx drug. , including the establishment of the Lanier Theological Library, a donation for the Mark and Becky Lanier Professional Development Center at the Texas Tech School of Law , and the funding of the Lanier Center for Archaeology at Lipscomb University . He has published four books with InterVarsity Press, three which are apologetic defenses of the Christian faith through legal framing. He teaches a large Sunday school class at Champion's Forest Baptist and distributes his teaching via his ministry Biblical Literacy.
Lanier has also made cameos in two films including Puncture and A Lawyer Walks into a Bar.
Early and personal life Lanier was born on October 20, 1960.
As of 2005, he was married with five children. Lanier appears as a character with the same name in the 2011 film Puncture.
Legal career After graduating from Texas Tech University School of Law in 1984, Lanier began his legal career working in Houston for Fulbright & Jaworski (now Norton Rose Fulbright), working in the appellate and trial divisions.
In the 1998 trial of Aaron v. Abex, Lanier was the lead counsel for a group of steelworkers who contracted asbestos disease at an Alabama steel mill. The jury verdict was $115 million.
In 2004 Lanier founded the Christian Trial Lawyers Association.
Social media addiction litigation
In 2026, Lanier was lead trial counsel for a trial against Meta and Google concerning claims that their social media and streaming platforms caused or worsened depression, anxiety and body dysmorphia in minors, including allegations that the platforms were addictive. The plaintiff, a young woman identified by her initials, alleged that she became addicted to Instagram and YouTube as a child and that the addiction worsened her mental health. Lanier tried the case with his daughters, Rachel Lanier, managing attorney of the firm’s Los Angeles office, and Sarah Lanier, along with Rahul Ravipudi, a lawyer outside of Lanier’s firm. In June 2026, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Carolyn Kuhl denied the defendants’ post-trial motions, and both companies appealed the following month.
Subsequent media coverage described Lanier’s use of artificial intelligence tools during the trial to assist with trial preparation, transcript review, and evaluation of jury questions. Business Insider reported that Lanier described the technology as subject to attorney oversight rather than a substitute for legal research or brief writing.
Vioxx litigation
In 2005, Lanier represented Carol Ernst in a lawsuit against Merck & Co., a pharmaceutical company and manufacturer of Vioxx, an anti-inflammatory drug used to treat osteoarthritis and acute pain conditions. Ernst was married to Robert Ernst, a former marathon runner who died after taking the medication. The case was initially decided in Ernst's favor, with a jury awarding her a $253 million verdict. In another case Lanier obtained consumer fraud findings against Merck who it was claimed had misled doctors and patients by concealing information about Vioxx and its risks. The first ruling was overturned on appeal in 2008 with the court noting Lanier "had not proved that Vioxx caused Mr. Ernst’s death" and compensatory damages were reduced in the second.
Artificial hip litigation Following the 2010 DePuy Hip Recall, Lanier represented plaintiffs in several lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson and DePuy Synthes, which Johnson & Johnson acquired in 1998. The implants were said to cause a build-up of metal ions in the blood, causing groin pain, allergic reactions, bone erosion and tissue death. The verdict included $140 million in total compensatory damages and about $360 million in punitive damages. The jury ruled that the implants were defectively designed and that the companies failed to warn the public about their risks.
In March 2016, five North Texas residents being represented by Lanier were awarded about $500 million for alleged complications arising from the hip implants. The award was later reduced to $151 million at appeal. In November 2016, Lanier won a $1 billion payout to six plaintiffs affected by the implants, followed by a further $247 million to six New York residents.
In the third trial, a Dallas federal jury award $1 billion in December 2016 to six California residents represented by Mark Lanier who claimed defective Pinnacle metal-on-metal hip implants made by Johnson & Johnson were defectively designed and that the companies failed to warn consumers about the risks. The case at trial was In re: DePuy Orthopaedics Inc. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas.
In November 2017, a federal jury in Dallas returned a $247 million verdict against Johnson & Johnson in the fourth bellwether trial in multidistrict litigation related to injuries and medical complications caused by the Pinnacle metal-on-metal hip implant. Mark Lanier was trial lawyer for a group of six New York residents whose hips had to be surgically removed. The panel awarded a total of $79 million in actual damages and $168 million in punitive damages against Johnson & Johnson.
In April 2018, a retrial was ordered by the 5th Circuit court of appeals in the case against DePuy Orthopaedics, with the appeal judges accusing Lanier of "inflammatory tactics and outright deception" in the trial. Reuters reported that the ruling had a "truly extraordinary tone" when criticising Lanier's actions at the trial. Lanier had told jurors that in contrast to DePuy's expert witnesses in the case, his expert witnesses were unpaid when in fact they were compensated $65,000 after the trial. Lanier indicated that he disclosed the post-trial payments to the defendants commenting to Reuters, "this came to light because I told the parties about it...I never hid anything." Lanier also insinuated that DePuy were liable because they had been accused of bribing officials from Saddam Hussein's Iraqi regime and claimed that executives at DePuy were racist. It was the second bellwether trial in multidistrict litigation (MDL) of more than 9,000 similar lawsuits consolidated in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas.
The retrial began in January 2019 and in May that year Reuters reported that Johnson & Johnson had reached an agreement to settle 95% of the 6,000 cases for a $1bn.
After a retrial was ordered by U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, Johnson & Johnson agreed to a $1 billion settlement to resolve the bulk of the hip implant defect lawsuits in January 2019.
Johnson & Johnson talc litigation
In 2018, Lanier led the trial team representing 22 women who had filed suit against Johnson & Johnson. The lawsuit alleged that the company's talcum powder products contained asbestos and that, after several years of use, had caused each of the women's ovarian cancer. The trial lasted six weeks and resulted in $550 million in compensatory damages and $4.14 billion in punitive damages being awarded to the plaintiffs.
Johnson & Johnson appealed the jury verdict in June 2020, and the Eastern District Court of Appeals of Missouri upheld $2.11 billion of the $4.69 billion jury verdict. The opinion stated that Johnson & Johnson had been aware of the potential asbestos contamination for several decades. On June 1, 2021, the Supreme Court of the United States denied a request by Johnson & Johnson to overturn the $2.11 billion verdict.
BP energy royalty litigation Mark Lanier and The Lanier Law Firm represented a class of more than 1,000 Oklahoma natural gas well royalty owners alleging that BP had underpaid royalties by deducting processing costs and post-production midstream services. In October 2018, the reached a $221 million settlement with BP LLC.
Opioids In late 2019, Lanier represented Summit and Cuyahoga counties in the first trial against pharmaceutical companies for damages caused by the distribution of addictive opioid painkillers. The defendants included distributors McKesson Corporation, Cardinal Health, AmerisourceBergen, Walgreens and Teva Pharmaceuticals. The lawsuit claimed that the drug distributors failed to monitor sales as required by federal law and report suspicious activity, which contributed to opioid addictions. Hours before the start of a trial, three pharmaceutical distributors and a manufacturer reached a settlement $260 million to resolve litigation over damages caused by the opioid epidemic.
Lanier also represented Trumbull and Lake counties against retail pharmacies for excessive distribution of addictive opioid painkillers. The lawsuit alleged that pharmacies operated by CVS Health, Walgreens, and Walmart created a public nuisance through the over-prescription of pain medication in those communities which contributed to hundreds of overdose deaths. The trial lasted six weeks with the jury returning a verdict finding the Ohio pharmacies liable. It was the first trial where pharmacy companies defended themselves amidst the opioid epidemic, and Lanier indicated the counties were seeking $1 billion.
Google antitrust litigation In December 2020, Mark Lanier and The Lanier Law Firm were hired by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton to represent the state of Texas in antitrust litigation brought against Google parent company, Alphabet Inc. Texas was leading a coalition of state attorneys general in claims that Google's dominant position in digital advertising created an unfair competitive advantage.
EpiPen MDL Mark Lanier is the lead trial lawyer representing EpiPen buyers accusing Pfizer and Mylan of illegally inflating prices of the EpiPen emergency treatment for allergic reactions. The first trial in multidistrict litigation consolidated in Kansas federal court is scheduled for September 2021.
In January 2021, Mark Lanier was appointed to the plaintiff steering committee for multidistrict litigation. More than 40 lawsuits consolidated in New Jersey federal court charge that Johnson & Johnson's pharmaceutical unit concealed harmful side effects of the Elmiron bladder cyst medication, resulting in serious eye damage.
Remington Rifle litigation Mark Lanier and The Lanier Law Firm represented owners of the Remington Model 700 bolt-action rifle in class action litigation related to design defects that caused the rifle to fire without the trigger being pulled. In July 2018, a federal appeals panel approved a settlement for millions of the rifles to be retrofitted with new trigger mechanisms.
Lanier Theological Library In 2010, Lanier created the Lanier Theological Library in Houston Texas. This is a private theological research library with private collections which include Chaim Cohen, Alan Crown, Abraham Malamat, and Randall Price. The library also hosts lectures by theological speakers.
Don’t just read it —
keep it.
Full-length biographies made to live with: read them, listen on the way to work, watch them tonight.
- E-book
- Audio
- Video
Instant download · yours to keep · every purchase keeps this site free
Important facts
People in W. Mark Lanier's life
Named in this biography and alive at the same time
Contemporaries
People whose lives overlapped W. Mark Lanier's
Frequently asked questions
Who is W. Mark Lanier?
American lawyer
When was W. Mark Lanier born?
W. Mark Lanier was born on 20 October 1960 in Lubbock.
What is W. Mark Lanier's occupation?
W. Mark Lanier is a lawyer.
What nationality is W. Mark Lanier?
W. Mark Lanier is American.
Sources & further reading
Cite this page
APA: Biography.guide. (2026). W. Mark Lanier. https://biography.guide/w-mark-lanier/
MLA: "W. Mark Lanier." Biography.guide, https://biography.guide/w-mark-lanier/.
Chicago: "W. Mark Lanier." Biography.guide. https://biography.guide/w-mark-lanier/.
Data last updated: 2026-09-22 · Spot an error? Report a correction.
Page generated 2026-09-27 05:26 UTC