John Pollexfen

John Pollexfen (1636–1715), of Walbrooke House in the parish of St Stephen Walbrook, City of London and of Wembury House in Devon, was a merchant, a courtier to Kings Charles II and William III, and a political economist He was opposed to the monopoly of the East India Company.

Origins The received affiliation, makes John the second son of Andrew Pollexfen (died 1670) of Stancombe Dawney in the parish of Sherford, Devon, by his wife Joan Woollcombe (born 1607). John's elder brother was Henry Pollexfen (1632-1691), of Nutwell in the parish of Woodbury, Devon, Lord Chief Justice of the Common Pleas 1689-1691. Andrew, the father, was a younger grandson of John Pollexfen of Kitley in the parish of Yealmpton in Devon: Joan's sister Phillippa Woolcombe married Henry Treby, and was grandmother of the attorney George Treby, with whom John Pollexfen was long associated.

For his Heraldic Visitations of Devon (1895), Lt.-Col. J.L. Vivian reconstructed a different parentage for John and his brethren from the reading of various wills. This appears unreliable and has not been accepted.

Career John's elder brother Henry inherited the family estates, which led to strained relations between the brothers. John's early career as a London merchant began with trading in wines from the Iberian Peninsula, leading to a summons to the Treasury on 28 March 1677 to report on Portuguese wines. He was sufficiently successful that in 1668 he built for himself Walbrooke House, a mansion in the City parish of St Stephen Walbrook, and in 1686 he purchased the manor of Wembury. In 1675 he served on the Committee on Trade and Plantations. He received an appointment in 1678 to the Privy Chamber, which he held until 1685; re-appointed in 1690, he remained until 1702. and again for the Parliaments of 1681, 1689 and 1690. While there he participated in the recoinage debate, produced a report on the judicial system of Barbados and advocated a unified military command for the American colonies.

In 1677 he served on a special commission relating to the East India Company, accusing the directors of monopolising the trade, through jobbery and refusal to issue new stock: he also condemned the export of gold bullion, which he saw as suppressing domestic production and employment. In 1684, his brother Henry Pollexfen defended Captain Thomas Sands in the celebrated monopoly case brought against him by the East India Company (East India Company v Sandys) for independent trading. and also published A Discourse of Trade and Coyn dated 15 July 1696, an extended version of which was republished to counter William Lowndes's proposal of recoinage. In connection with the Great Recoinage of 1696 and the activities of the East India Company, his arguments were closely considered by Sir Isaac Newton, who, while holding more positive views upon paper credit than Pollexfen, described him as a "most able member" of the Council of Trade. In 1699 he published A Vindication of some Assertions Relating to Coin and Trade, and a year later republished Of Trade.

He served as a Gentleman of the Privy Chamber 1678-85 (to King Charles II) and 1690-1702 (to King William III). in the City of London.