Pichit Chuenban

Pichit Chuenban (, ; born 22 January 1959) is a Thai lawyer and politician who served as an MP and as a Prime Minister's Office Minister between 27 April 2024 and 21 May 2024. He had previously served as a lawyer to Thaksin Shinawatra, where he was involved in a bribery scandal and sentenced to six months in jail in 2008. Pichit was subsequently part of the legal team of the Pheu Thai Party, where he served under Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra.

Law and political career

Bribery scandal In 2008, Pichit began representing Thaksin Shinawatra and his wife Potjaman Na Pombejra in the Ratchadaphisek land case. On 25 June 2008, the Supreme Court sentenced Pichit, Thana Tansiri, and Supasri Srisawat to six months in prison for contempt of court after attempting to bribe Supreme Court officials by handing them a lunchbox containing ฿2 million inside a paper bag. The bag had been left at the Supreme Court earlier on 10 June and was discovered on the same day Thaksin and Potjaman were due to appear before the court. All three denied any wrongdoing. Thana admitted to the money belonging to him. He however said that the money was not intended to be a bribe and the fault laid in his driver who was supposed to pick up an identical bag containing chocolate for the Supreme Court officials. After serving their six months jail time, prosecutors didn't press bribery charges against them. On 30 May 2014, the Central Administrative Court dismissed an attempt by Pichit and Supasri to overturn their license bans. After Thaksin was re-issued a Thai passport while in self-imposed exile in December 2011, Pichit - who had become part of Pheu Thai's legal team - defended the Ministry of Foreign Affairs' decision. Also during 2011, Pichit was elected a party-list MP for Pheu Thai in the House of Representatives after the 2011 general election.

In April 2013, Pheu Thai and coalition parties enacted a bill to amend Article 68 and 237 of the 2007 constitution of Thailand, seeking to restrict the people's right to submit petitions to the Constitutional Court via the Office of the Attorney-General only. This was criticised by 40 senators, and a complaint was filed to the Constitutional Court against 312 Parliamentarians by Senator Somchai Sawaengkarn on 2 April. Pichit responded by saying that the court's judges would face a probe for accepting Somchai's complaint by violating Article 40 of the charter by violating the defender's right to a fair trial by indicating their opinions on the case. Pichit also defended the amendment by stating that Article 291 of the constitution allowed for Parliament to amend some articles and that their amendment would not deprive people of rights. On 20 April, he issued a statement on behalf of affected MPs and Senators.

During a cabinet reshuffle on 30 June 2013, Pichit was expected to have been appointed as a Prime Minister's Office Minister under Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra. In February, the NACC came to the decision to charge Yingluck for dereliction of duty and called her to report to the NACC office on 27 February. She was however absent and sent her lawyer Pichit to acknowledge the charge on her behalf. Later in March during the Pheu Thai campaign for the 2014 general election, Pichit and 15 other candidates came under controversy for allegedly violating Section 60 of the law governing elections by appearing on the state-owned Channel 11 between 10 December 2013 and 7 January 2014. Section 60 deals with the use of state media for election campaigns.

As Prime Minister's Office Minister During a cabinet reshuffle in April 2024, Pichit was appointed as a Prime Minister's Office Minister. Pichit had previously been an advisor to Srettha Thavisin. His qualifications and eligibility were also checked by the Legal Execution Department, NACC, Secretariat to the Prime Minister, and Royal Thai Police. On May 17, a group of 40 military-appointed outgoing senators acting in a caretaker role filed a petition to the Constitutional Court requesting the removal of Pichit and Srettha from office. The senators argued that Pichit was unfit to serve in a cabinet post due to him having served jail time, and that his appointment violated Section 160 (4) and (5) of the court charter. On 14 August, the Constitutional Court dismissed Srettha for appointing Pichit to his cabinet, ruling that his inclusion fell short of official moral and ethical standards.

The Bangkok Post described his resignation as an attempt to spare Srettha from "possible legal hurdles associated with appointing him".