Perugu Sree Sudha

Notable judgements Telangana High Court In "Joshi Madhavi vs Union of India", a division bench that included Sudha examined the scope of remission authority between central and state governments. The court held that withholding consent for remission without consideration of state government opinion may constitute an abuse of executive discretion.

In another matter, the court addressed questions regarding inheritance rights and the legal capacity of guardians to relinquish property rights on behalf of minor children. The court held that mothers cannot unilaterally relinquish the property rights of their minor children without appropriate legal authority.

Karnataka High Court In "Suresh Vathar vs Siddarama", a single bench decision by justice Perugu Sree Sudha examined evidentiary requirements in motor accident compensation appeals. The court held that a claimant must file a timely complaint and establish both the occurrence of the accident and the involvement of the vehicle to succeed in a claim.

In another motor accident appeal, Justice Perugu Sree Sudha examined an appeal against a Motor accidents claim tribunal order. The court held that inexplicable delays in filing complaints and the absence of supporting documentation constitute material defeciencies in establishing liability and entitlement to compensation.