Biography.guide
Home › People › Barrister › Walter Sofronoff
Portrait of Walter Sofronoff

Walter Sofronoff

Australian judge

Don't just read it — keep itBiographies to ownE-book · Audio · Video From $7 →

About Walter Sofronoff

Walter Sofronoff was an Australian barrister.

Walter Sofronoff is an Australian jurist and lawyer who in 2025 was found by the ACT Integrity Commission and the Federal Court of Australia to have engaged in Serious Corrupt Conduct during his appointment as sole Commissioner in the 2023 Board of Inquiry into the ACT Criminal Justice System. Prior to this, he served as the President of the Queensland Court of Appeal from 2017 to 2022 and as the Solicitor-General of Queensland from 2005 to 2014.

Early life and education Sofronoff attended the Anglican Church Grammar School in Brisbane, and completed a Bachelor of Arts and Bachelor of Laws (Honours) at the University of Queensland in 1976.

Career Sofronoff was called to the Bar in 1977 and took silk in 1988. He resigned as solicitor-general in 2014 amid tensions between the Newman government and the legal fraternity that resulted from the appointment of Tim Carmody as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Queensland.

In 2016, Sofronoff was responsible for the successful High Court appeal that overturned the Queensland Court of Appeal's decision to downgrade Gerard Baden-Clay's murder conviction to manslaughter. Sofronoff retired from the role on 20 May 2022.

Inquiries and reviews

On 11 May 2015, Sofronoff was appointed as Commissioner for the Grantham Floods Commission of Inquiry. In his written report, Sofronoff concluded that the flood "was a natural disaster and that no human agency caused it or could ever have prevented it".

Sofronoff was appointed to lead a review of Queensland's parole system in 2016. On 6 June 2022, he was appointed as Commissioner for the Commission of Inquiry into Forensic DNA Testing in Queensland.

On 22 December 2022, during the ramifications of the 2021 Australian Parliament House sexual misconduct allegations, Sofronoff was appointed to lead the Australian Capital Territory government's Board of Inquiry into the Criminal Justice System, which reviewed the circumstances surrounding the aborted prosecution of Bruce Lehrmann. Sofronoff's report was provided to the government on 31 July 2023. Sofronoff provided an advance copy of the report to journalists from the Australian who reported widely on the findings before it was provided to the government. It was reported that at the time Sofronoff handed the report to a journalist at The Australian, he was scheduled to speak at a Queensland Press Club event hosted by The Australian.

Shane Drumgold SC challenged Sofronoff's report by way of a judicial review before the ACT Supreme Court. Following a three day hearing, Kaye AJ of the ACT Supreme Court declared that all adverse findings gave rise to the apprehension that they might have been influenced by the views held and publicly expressed by Ms Albrechtsen from The Australian, and further declared that a finding that a cross-examination of Senator Linda Reynolds was grossly unethical was also legally unreasonable, and that a further finding that Drumgold made a false statement to the Chief Police Officer also failed to observe to observed natural justice. Kaye AJ further ordered that the ACT Government pay Drumgold's costs including any reserved costs save for any costs incurred in respect of the abandoned ground 1.

Evidence was provided that Sofronoff engaged in 91 telephone calls with journalists, 51 of which were with Ms Janet Albrechtsen, and 22 of which were with Mr Hedley Thomas from the Australian. The 91 telephone calls were for a total of 13 hours and 37 minutes. The telephone calls with Ms Albrechtsen were for 6 hours and 19 minutes, and with Mr Thomas for 5 hours and 8 minutes. By contrast the telephone calls with all other journalists during that period occupied a total of 2 hours and 10 minutes. It was further revealed that Albrechtsen flew to Brisbane for a private lunch with Sofronoff. It was reported that the contact with Albrechtsen was in stark contrast with that afforded other media outlets. In September 2024, the ACT Supreme Court released 1700 pages of communications, revealing complaints from other journalists, including The Australian reporting on things that did not happen. It also revealed that Sofronoff personally provided documents to Albrechtsen that he had marked "strictly confidential".

An investigation by the ACT Bar Association subsequently found that the evidence relied upon by Sofronoff to make his adverse findings did not amount to either unsatisfactory professional conduct or professional misconduct. It was reported on 6 November 2024 that The NSW Bar Association had also found no misconduct, and that Drumgold was a fit and proper person to practise law and had issued him a barristers practising certificate. It was reported that Drumgold had also commenced a PhD on accountability structures for commissioned inquiries, in the hope of preventing what went wrong in the Sofronoff Inquiry from happening again. On 16 October 2024, the Chief Minister of the ACT publicly stated that it was a mistake to appoint Mr Sofronoff to the Board of Inquiry.

Serious Corrupt Conduct Finding On 5 April 2024, the ACT Integrity Commission published a media release, announcing that it was looking into the conduct of Sofronoff. On 13 May 2024, Integrity Commissioner Michael Adams KC released a statement stating that after a preliminary examination, he suspected on reasonable grounds, that Sofronoff's conduct may constitute corrupt conduct and had launched an investigation. On 19 March 2025, the ACT Integrity Commission released its report, finding that Sofronoff had engaged in serious corrupt conduct during the public inquiry. The report found that the ACT Supreme Court findings rendered the Sofronoff findings legally invalid for jurisdictional error, however due to the deliberate actions of Sofronoff, Drumgold was denied the opportunity to block the release of the report, a consequence the Integrity Commission found was both predictable and irreparable.

Walter Sofronoff KC appealed the ACT Integrity Commission findings that he engaged in serious corrupt conduct to the Federal Court. On 11 December 2025, the Federal Court dismissed all 12 grounds of appeal, and confirmed the finding that Sofronoff engaged in serious corrupt conduct.

Personal life Sofronoff is married. He has three children and one daughter-in-law.

Biography shop

Don’t just read it —
keep it.

Full-length biographies made to live with: read them, listen on the way to work, watch them tonight.

  • E-book
  • Audio
  • Video
Browse the shop — from $7

Instant download · yours to keep · every purchase keeps this site free

Important facts

Occupation
Nationality
Education
University of Queensland, Anglican Church Grammar School

Frequently asked questions

Who was Walter Sofronoff?

Australian judge

What was Walter Sofronoff's occupation?

Walter Sofronoff was a barrister.

What nationality was Walter Sofronoff?

Walter Sofronoff was Australian.

Sources & further reading

· Wikipedia: Walter Sofronoff

· Wikidata: Q47542417

· DBpedia: Walter Sofronoff

Cite this page

APA: Biography.guide. (2026). Walter Sofronoff. https://biography.guide/walter-sofronoff/

MLA: "Walter Sofronoff." Biography.guide, https://biography.guide/walter-sofronoff/.

Chicago: "Walter Sofronoff." Biography.guide. https://biography.guide/walter-sofronoff/.

Data last updated: 2026-09-20 · Spot an error? Report a correction.

Page generated 2026-09-27 05:20 UTC