About Michael Hout
Born 1950. Michael Hout is an American sociologist and academic.
Michael Hout (born May 14, 1950) is a professor of sociology at New York University. He previously served as a professor at the University of Arizona and University of California, Berkeley.
Hout has studied social inequality, religion, and politics using demographic methods. Much of his research concerns social mobility, with demographic analyses focused on revealing the social facts that block opportunity and create unfairness, while controlling the effects of confounding variables. His other work has examined changing occupational hierarchies and long-term trends associated with political polarization. He measured the decisive effect of education on social mobility and explored the persistent and evolving role of social class. His influential study of Ireland quantified the effects of factors including class, education, religion, and geography, and complicated the idea that industrialization is accompanied by reduction in inequality. Hout's sociological approach relies on detailed statistical analyses of large surveys and census data—in common with Otis Duncan and Peter Blau, Inequality by Design: Cracking the Bell Curve Myth, and Century of Difference.
Early life and career Michael Hout was born on May 14, 1950, in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, where his family was rooted in the local community. His father worked for 35 years as a bus driver for Greyhound, while his mother initially sold children’s shoes at a neighborhood shop before transitioning to an office role at an insurance company downtown. Hout grew up with three siblings, all of whom still reside in Pittsburgh. Hout initially planned to pursue a career in high school education, but his academic interests shifted during his undergraduate years at the University of Pittsburgh under the guidance of two professors: historian David Montgomery and sociologist Brian Vargus. In 1972, Hout graduated from the University of Pittsburgh with a bachelor’s degree in sociology and history. Hout was encouraged by Vargus to continue his academic journey in sociology at Indiana University Bloomington. He attended Indiana University and received his doctorate in sociology in 1976 under Phillips Cutright. He remained at Berkeley until 2013, when he became a professor at New York University and director of its Center for Advanced Social Science Research.
Hout has been involved with the General Social Survey (GSS) as chair of the GSS Board of Overseers (1997–2001) and co-principal investigator (2009–2016). He has worked on large-scale projects like the American Opportunity Study. Hout is also on the board of the Societal Expert Action Network (SEAN), sponsored by the Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education (DBASSE) at the National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine (NASEM), The work addressed shortcomings in certain applications of chi-squared tests, suggesting the addition of the G-test, whose statistic can also be used for model selection. The work also formalized various log-linear models, where the logarithm of each table entry is a linear sum of a reduced set of variables. With Michael Sobel and Otis Duncan, Hout explored the quasi-symmetric case in mobility tables, developing a parametrization that separated exchange and structural mobility. Hout later developed models to analyze trends in time.
With Leo A. Goodman, Hout developed a general regression-type model to measure the effect of a third variable on a two-way association between qualitative variables.
As part of Hout's involvement with the General Social Survey, he worked on the digitization of occupational data, standardizing decades of survey responses to the 2010 census classification—a move that "allowed researchers to systematically analyze long-term occupational trends under a consistent coding scheme, thereby enabling new insights into social mobility, class identification, and demographic change."
Social Mobility and Inequality Hout has studied inequality and intergenerational mobility, including dimensions of inequality, including economic status, education, race, and gender. He investigates these factors to unequal life chances and the accessibility of resources, shaping individuals' experiences and opportunities. Hout's research involves tracking changes in inequality over time. His studies use longitudinal data to assess how shifting economic policies, educational attainment, and demographic trends affect levels of inequality. Inequality by Design: Cracking the Bell Curve Myth captured some significant aspects of the rank of individuals but could never account for the rapidly growing inequality of jobs, wages, and family outcomes, and life chances. It expanded on work Hout completed on the interaction between socioeconomic background and higher education in social mobility in the United States and Europe.
One of Hout's most notable works, "Maximally Maintained Inequality: Expansion, Reform, and Opportunity in Irish Education, 1921-75" Hout explores the debate over whether education primarily reflects pre-existing advantages or has an independent effect on socioeconomic outcomes. The study found that higher education has a positive causal impact, particularly for individuals from backgrounds less likely to pursue higher education. It suggests that college attendance can contribute to greater social mobility.
Inequality by Design: Cracking the Bell Curve Myth (1996), co-authored by Claude S. Fischer, Michael Hout, MartÃn Sánchez Jankowski, Samuel R. Lucas, Ann Swidler, and Kim Voss, served as a response to The Bell Curve (1994) by Charles Murray and Richard Herrnstein. Using data from the National Longitudinal Study of Youth and IQ measures from the Armed Forces Qualifying Test, the authors analyzed the relationship between intelligence measures and social inequality. Their analysis found that measured IQ accounts for approximately 10 percent of the variation in earnings, concluding that American income inequality would show little change if everyone had the same test score. In examining social policy implications, they point to factors such as the relationship between poverty risk and variables like gender and marital status, noting that groups with different poverty rates often show similar IQ scores. In a review in Political Science Quarterly, Lawrence Bobo noted that while the book was highly readable, it was primarily directed at an academic audience. The review also noted that some alternative perspectives, such as the role of educational tracking, received limited attention in the work. Hout found that the rise in religious disaffiliation is tied to the growing politicization of religion in American life, particularly the alignment of conservative religious groups with right-wing politics. He also found demographic effects such as differential birth rates to be significant.
Earlier work by Hout focused on methodological concerns. In "The Center Doesn't Hold: Church Attendance in the United States, 1940–1984" (1987), Hout and Andrew Greeley wrote that "official attendance counts fail to capture the ebb and flow of religious participation," highlighting the tendency of individuals to overreport churchgoing and the danger of relying exclusively on institutional figures. These findings anticipated their later argument in "The Secularization Myth" (1989) that perceived religious decline may be overstated when demographic evidence — especially birth rates, intergenerational retention, and survey-based nuances — is overlooked. At the same time, Hout and Greeley's "Musical Chairs: Patterns of Denominational Change in the United States" (1988) underscored the complexity of affiliation switching: Catholics, Protestants, and others frequently shifted denominational ties without necessarily abandoning religion entirely. He has also noted that individuals' religious affiliations can weaken over time then reemerge with marriage, childbirth, or other family-related events.
In investigating the socioeconomic effects of religious discrimination in Northern Ireland, Hout found that class more significantly limited social mobility than religion. Likewise, in "Religion and Happiness" he reported that while religious affiliation can contribute to greater subjective well-being for some, the connection between religion and happiness is mediated by various social factors, including political beliefs, social class, and personal life experiences.
Hout, with Andrew M. Greeley, in The Truth About Conservative Christians examined the beliefs, practices, and political views of conservative Christians in American society. The research challenges common media portrayals of conservative Christians as a monolithic group, finding more diverse and nuanced views among them. The book argues that while conservative Christians are more likely than other Protestants to hold conservative positions on issues like abortion and to vote Republican, these correlations are not as strong as often portrayed. The authors found that the additional Republican vote among Conservative Protestants, compared to Mainline American Protestants, was approximately seven percentage points. In analyzing race and religion, the work examined how racial identity intersects with and reshapes the relationship between Conservative Protestantism and conservative politics. The authors also developed a classification scheme that treated African-American religious bodies separately from other Protestant denominations due to their distinct historical traditions. Hout has studied the differences between left and right leaning American voters across the intersectionality of race and religion. He studied political leanings on immigration with the turmoil over the 2016 election. Hout has also studied attitudes towards abortion, and how political divides have become more prominent than any other identifying factor. Hout has also observed with the GSS that the extent of opinions has also increased in recent years. Additionally, Hout studies voting patterns amongst different societal groups, attempting to explain voting blocks. Most recently, Hout has worked on how marital status could affect how one decides to vote in elections. He has also studied ethic attachments and class voting patterns.
Hout gave a descriptive account of changing political opinions, alongside shifting demographics, in the United States over the course of the twentieth century in Century of Difference, written with Claude S. Fischer.
Awards and honors Michael Hout was elected to the American Academy of Arts & Sciences in 1997, the National Academy of Sciences in 2003, the American Philosophical Society in 2006, the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences in 2018, and the American Association of the Advancement of Science in 2021.
He received the Robert M. Hauser Award from the American Sociological Association's Inequality, Poverty, and Mobility Section in 2018. In 2016, the University College Dublin conferred on him the honorary degree of Doctors of Letters. for Century of Difference by the American Sociological Association's section on Population in 2007, and the Clifford C. Clogg Memorial Award for Inequality by Design given by the Population Association of America in 1996.
Selected works Journal articles "Status, Autonomy, and Training in Occupational Mobility" (1984) "More Universalism, Less Structural Mobility: The American Occupational Structure in the 1980s" (1988) "Maximally Maintained Inequality: Expansion, Reform, and Opportunity in Irish Education, 1921-75" (1993), with Adrian Raftery "The Persistence of Classes in Post-Industrial Societies" (1993), with Clem Brooks and Jeff Manza "Educational Stratification in Russia during the Soviet Period" (1995), with Theodore P. Gerber "The Democratic Class Struggle in the United States, 1948-1992" (1995), with Clem Brooks and Jeff Manza "Abortion Politics in the United States, 1972–1994: From Single Issue to Ideology" (1999) "Self-Employment, Family Background, and Race" (2000), with Harvey S. Rosen "Why More Americans Have No Religious Preference: Politics and Generations" (2002), with Claude S. Fischer "Distinguishing the Geographic Levels and Social Dimensions of US Metropolitan Segregation, 1960–2000" (2004), with Claude S. Fischer, Gretchen Stockmayer, and Jon Stiles "Intergenerational Social Mobility: The United States in Comparative Perspective" (2006), with Emily Beller "Social and Economic Returns to College Education in the United States" (2012) "Explaining Why More Americans Have No Religious Preference: Political Backlash and Generational Succession, 1987-2012" (2014), with Claude S. Fischer "Americans' Occupational Status Reflects the Status of Both of Their Parents" (2018) "Immigration, Race & Political Polarization" (2021), with Christopher Maggio
Books Mobility Tables (1983) Following in Father's Footsteps: Social Mobility in Ireland (1989) Inequality by Design: Cracking the Bell Curve Myth (1996) The Truth about Conservative Christians: What They Think and What They Believe (2006) Century of Difference (2006)
Don’t just read it —
keep it.
Full-length biographies made to live with: read them, listen on the way to work, watch them tonight.
- E-book
- Audio
- Video
Instant download · yours to keep · every purchase keeps this site free
Important facts
People in Michael Hout's life
Named in this biography and alive at the same time
Contemporaries
People whose lives overlapped Michael Hout's
Frequently asked questions
Who is Michael Hout?
American sociologist
When was Michael Hout born?
Michael Hout was born on 14 May 1950.
What is Michael Hout's occupation?
Michael Hout is a sociologist and academic.
What nationality is Michael Hout?
Michael Hout is American.
Sources & further reading
Cite this page
APA: Biography.guide. (2026). Michael Hout. https://biography.guide/michael-hout/
MLA: "Michael Hout." Biography.guide, https://biography.guide/michael-hout/.
Chicago: "Michael Hout." Biography.guide. https://biography.guide/michael-hout/.
Data last updated: 2026-09-20 · Spot an error? Report a correction.
Page generated 2026-09-27 05:28 UTC